Vanilla 1.1.8 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Given the site we are on… bad books vs. good books?
All I can think of X(
Talent? I think it’s an interesting concept…
rhetorical analysis?
Define “rhetoric”. Better yet, define “analysis”. Nothing like a bit of metatextuality to get a teacher’s blood pumping. You can even take a historical direction with the definition of “analysis”:
etymology of “analysis” (from Online Etymology Dictonary):
1580s, “resolution of anything complex into simple elements” (opposite of synthesis), from M.L. analysis, from Gk. analysis “a breaking up,” from analyein “unloose, release, set free,” from ana “up, throughout” + lysis “a loosening,” from lyein “to unfasten” (see lose). Psychological sense is from 1890. Phrase in the final (or last) analysis (1844), translates Fr. en dernière analyse.
The relationship between the idea of ‘breaking things down into their parts” and the modern idea of literary analysis which is more about the discussion of themes and concepts, and often the invention of themes and concepts that were not put there intentionally by the author, could be interesting. Where the original term ‘analysis’ did mean breaking something down into its original parts, as in chemistry, in litarary analysis or deconstruction, the focus has shifted to ‘what does the analyser see in the text, regardless of its intended or actual parts?”
That could be an interesting paper to write.
I’d go with the hero/ism idea. That gives you a lot to talk about, with different ideas of heroism, non-hero protagonists, heroic antagonists etc.
Also, you could mention comic books with a completely serious face.
1 to 8 of 8