Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

Vanilla 1.1.8 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2010
     

    For the last time! The thing was nothing like a cross between a wolf and a man. IT WAS A FRIGGIN’ MONKEY.

    You don’t get to question my taste in film until you grow up.

    Ooooh. Okay. Right. Sorry. Good of you to clear that up. You don’t have to take anything I say seriously. I should never have questioned your opinion. Of course I can’t have credible opinions. I’m just a kid, y’know?

    • CommentAuthorRocky
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2010 edited
     
    Begging your pardon. I didn't realize we had an authority on lycanthropy on the board. In any case, let's review: clawed fingers and toes, triple-joined legs (i.e. walks on his toes), tall, pointed ears, pronounced canines, upturned dog-like nose, covered from head to toe in fur. That's a WOLF-MAN, not a large wolf that happens to favor bipedal mobility. Oh, and about that underbite? Do an image search for wolf teeth and tell me what you see.

    bq. Ooooh. Okay. Right. Sorry. Good of you to clear that up. You don’t have to take anything I say seriously. I should never have questioned your opinion. Of course I can’t have credible opinions. I’m just a kid, y’know?

    Considering your juvenile attitude towards the source material, what choice do I have? I might as well suggest _Nosferatu_ for a few laughs.
    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2010
     

    Stop this. If you insist, resort to private messages.

    • CommentAuthorWiseWillow
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2010
     

    Could we please calm down? Both of you are getting a little too worked up. Spanman disliked the design, Rocky liked it. But I think we can ALL agree…

    That is just wrong. Especially since it is stately explicitly in Prisoner of Azkaban and Order of the Phoenix that Potter werewolves are people who turn into wolves. Actual wolves. Not wolf-men.

    • CommentAuthorRocky
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2010
     
    My silence is my command and no one else's.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2010 edited
     
    EDIT: Oops, sorry Virgil.

    *spirits self away*
  1.  

    I think you two should just make out already and get it over with.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2010 edited
     

    That is just wrong. Especially since it is stately explicitly in Prisoner of Azkaban and Order of the Phoenix that Potter werewolves are people who turn into wolves. Actual wolves. Not wolf-men.

    ...

    Just because HP had “men who turned into wolves” it doesn’t mean it’s a rule of the universe that all werewolves are men who turn into wolves. Just look at Twilight “vampires”. Everybody has their own interpretation, SMeyer imagines vampires as “sparkly beautiful blood sucking people,” whoever made Wolfman had his own way of imagining a werewolf. This is the most ridiculous thing to fight over. We all have our separate opinions and interpretations.

    • CommentAuthorRocky
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2010 edited
     
    bq. Just because HP had “men who turned into wolves” it doesn’t mean it’s a rule of the universe that all werewolves are men who turn into wolves.

    Er, based on the etymology of "werewolf", it actually does. Or something in between, at least
    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2010 edited
     

    True, but my point is there are a lot of different interpretations of werewolves. Joss Whedon’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer had werewolves as a kind of half human half wolf. Anyway, let’s not derail this thread anymore, we’re all entitled to our own opinion, let’s not force it on others.

    • CommentAuthorWiseWillow
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2010
     

    Just because HP had “men who turned into wolves” it doesn’t mean it’s a rule of the universe that all werewolves are men who turn into wolves. Just look at Twilight “vampires”. Everybody has their own interpretation, SMeyer imagines vampires as “sparkly beautiful blood sucking people,” whoever made Wolfman had his own way of imagining a werewolf. This is the most ridiculous thing to fight over. We all have our separate opinions and interpretations.

    Bahaha, Puppet, you missed the point. I know there’s all different kinds of werewolves, and that’s fine! I just was trying to defuse the situation by pointing out that the movie people were told “okay, so it’s a wolf, but it has a tufted tail, narrower pupils, different ears” and they came up with, well, that. Harry Potter werewolves are actual wolves. I didn’t mean to imply all werewolves have to be that way xD

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2010
     

    ...

    I liked Wolfman CGI.
    :D

  2.  

    Watched the A+E Pride and Prejudice while on the treadmill.

    It’s the only way they can make me run. :)

    •  
      CommentAuthorJeni
    • CommentTimeMar 23rd 2010 edited
     

    Wandered into town today and decided to see what the cinema was showing, seeing as I had nothing else to do. It was either Shutter Island or The Spy Next Door.

    About two minutes indecision over serious film or fun film. I chose The Spy Next Door on the basis of Jackie Chan love. <3 Right choice. As it started I remembered that this was the film Sportacus was in. 8D

    Jackie Chan and Magnus Scheving? This film is awesome. It’s a shame a plot got in the way of the two of them awesome!fighting, otherwise it would have been perfect.

    Hahahah, it’s hilarious that Magnus plays a Russian dude, it’s like the makers thought “He sounds foreign! That’ll do! No one will know the difference.” Silly filmmakers, Magnus is Icelandic. Durrr.

  3.  

    Mom’s trying to convince me that I need to see the Passion of the Christ. I’m not going for that. I told her: “No way, mom. I’m not sadistic.”

    Her: “Oh come on! You watched Silence of the Lambs!”

    Me: “That’s different. That’s not an hour and a half of someone being beaten to death. Crucifixion was really nasty.”

    Her: “Well, you’ve watched other sad things. What about Schindler’s List.”

    Me: “Also different. Yes, it was violent and sad, but the point of the movie was not just the misery, but that Schindler was saving people from it, that way it’s uplifting as well as depressing. Also, the violence, while horrifying, wasn’t the focus point of the movie.”

    There’s no way I’m seeing it. I amy watch Jesus Christ Superstar, though. I’m just not sure which movie is better.

    •  
      CommentAuthorJeni
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2010
     

    Hahahah, you should (assuming you’re 18 or over), if I remember, it’s not a bad movie and James Caviezel has so very pretty eyes.

  4.  

    I’m seventeen and a half. But I’m not even a Christian, so I’m not obligated to see it.

    I just don’t LIKE watching long, drawn out torture. I don’t think I could stomach it.

    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2010
     

    But I’m not even a Christian, so I’m not obligated to see it.

    Absolutely no one is obligated to see it. Which is why I haven’t seen it.

  5.  

    Absolutely no one is obligated to see it. Which is why I haven’t seen it.

    Well, people are always like: “ormg u watch it cuz jesus suffered 4 u!”

    Even if I believed that, I still wouldn’t watch it. Christian Torture-porn doesn’t appeal to me.

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2010
     

    Christian Torture-porn

    Well put. Its marketed to people that way though.

    •  
      CommentAuthorJeni
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2010
     

    But pretty eyes!

    No really, they are astonishingly pretty.

  6.  

    Well, I’ve just googled him, and Jeni’s right. But Pretty Eyes are not going to cut it.

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2010
     

    I watched it.

    I cried.

    Don’t watch it when you’re 12. It screws you up. Trust me.

    •  
      CommentAuthorJeni
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2010
     

    O_o That’s because it’s 18/NC-17, why the heck were you watching it at 12?

  7.  

    It’s only rated R here in the US, which means overly Christian parents are free to force their children to watch it.

  8.  

    I amy watch Jesus Christ Superstar, though

    Heheh, I love that musical. :D

    •  
      CommentAuthorMoldorm
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2010
     

    It makes Biblical stories fun even to non-believers, and without any potentially offensive material at all!

  9.  

    I watched it.

    I won’t.

    I cried.

    I know I would, even though I’m not a Christian. Thus I’m not watching it.

    Don’t watch it when you’re 12. It screws you up. Trust me.

    I can imagine. I actually wanted to see it at age 12/13, because back then I WAS a Christian. I’m so glad I didn’t.

    It’s only rated R here in the US, which means overly Christian parents are free to force their children to watch it.

    Yes. I find it very disturbing how the religion is based around a torture symbol, and that the story is told to young kids.

    Anyhoo, I just found out Rik Mayhall is in one of the versions of JCS. WAT? brain explodes

  10.  

    Yes. I find it very disturbing how the religion is based around a torture symbol, and that the story is told to young kids.

    Than you missed the whole point.

    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeMar 25th 2010
     

    Center Stage. Terrible acting, probably because only one actor in the main cast was actually, you know, an actor. However, the amazing dancing made up for everything.

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeMar 25th 2010 edited
     

    O_o That’s because it’s 18/NC-17, why the heck were you watching it at 12?

    Because of this:

    It’s only rated R here in the US, which means overly Christian parents are free to force their children to watch it.

    Funny, Chronicles of Riddick , and Alien vs. Predator never scared me like that.

    •  
      CommentAuthorApep
    • CommentTimeMar 25th 2010
     

    That’s because neither of those were rated R. The films they’re sequils/spin-offs of were.

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeMar 25th 2010
     

    ...

    facepalm

  11.  

    Than you missed the whole point.

    I realize the point is that Jesus died for our sins and rose again.

    The point is that Crucifixion is a nasy, brutal thing that kids don’t need to know about.

    I realize that it’s an important thing to teach kids if you’re a Christian. However, dragging them to the Passion is a horrible thing to do. It doesn’t matter if they “need to know what Jesus went through”, they don’t need to know at such a young age.

    And also, venerating the cross itself is strange. It’s a symbol of torture. In and of itself, it’s not holy. If Jesus had been beheaded, would Christians wear guillotines?

    I know I’m babbling. Sorry.

    •  
      CommentAuthorsansafro187
    • CommentTimeMar 25th 2010 edited
     

    I wasn’t particularly phased by watching the Passion, but I’m Catholic so bloody Jesus stopped phasing me around age 7. I’m pretty weak to gore in general, but that’s mainly guts and brains and such, rather than puncture wounds. I did enjoy watching it though, if only because I remember it being a really pretty movie, and the Latin was fun to try and decode without having studied it.

    All the Evangelical friends who got me to go were bawling uncontrollably though, and I was surrounded by girls, so it was even worse. I felt a little heartless.

    And also, venerating the cross itself is strange. It’s a symbol of torture.

    It’s a symbol of sacrifice now.

  12.  
  13.  

    Fiddler on the Roof, and I just realized that Tevye has really nice eyes.

    •  
      CommentAuthorMoldorm
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2010
     

    Apparently, Kick-Ass is released soon. This looks like a reasonable year for superhero movies.

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2010
     

    This pleases me.

    I saw Egg! I mean Bland! I mean Ann! :D

  14.  

    We have SO many movies on DVR...Watchmen, Moulin Rouge!, Slumdog Millionaire…

  15.  

    I have Lost In Translation, Unforgiven, and Children of Men on mine.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeMar 27th 2010
     

    Ratatouille. Never gets old. :D

  16.  

    I <3 Colette. She and Ego are my favourite characters.

    • CommentAuthorWiseWillow
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2010
     

    See, Emille makes my day.

    “Um…I’m gonna stay here”

    “That thunder’s getting closer. Hey, do you think that maybe- “

    “You can smell all that? You have a gift!”

    • CommentAuthorRocky
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2010
     
    bq. She and Ego are my favourite characters.

    O'Toole was an absolute cutthroat. Loved his work in that movie.
  17.  

    Ratatouille is just awesome.

    Speaking of animated films, just watched Kung Fu Panda instead of studying. :D

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2010
     

    She and Ego are my favourite characters.

    O’Toole was an absolute cutthroat. Loved his work in that movie.

    Ditto and ditto. Ego was awesome. :D

  18.  

    Last thing I watched was West Side Story. I liked it, but my family didn’t. :/

  19.  

    I feel bad about not watching it. I performed it a few weeks ago, so I feel I should’ve watched it.

  20.  

    Last thing I watched was West Side Story.

    That movie is so wonderful! :D

  21.  

    Really? I watched the beginning and found it hilarious, and not in a good way.

  22.  

    Really? I watched the beginning and found it hilarious, and not in a good way

    The beginning is lulzy. It gets better.

  23.  

    West Side Story ruined the idea of street gangs for me.

    •  
      CommentAuthorElanor
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2010
     

    West Side Story ruined the idea of street gangs for me.

    Clearly all street gangs sing and dance in the streets by way of fighting.

    I want to live in that universe, it would be awesome.

    “I challenge you…to a DANCE-OFF.”

    “And a sing-off!”

    AND A SING-OFF.”

  24.  

    Moulin Rouge is hilarious.

  25.  

    So I just saw Donnie Darko… oh man. I don’t even know. It was good, but such a mindfuck.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2010
     

    Just finished The Return of Jafar and Aladdin and the King of Thieves. Nothing compared to the first film. :/

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2010
     

    Dev-

    Dude, I want to see that SOO BAD.

  26.  

    Me too!

  27.  

    It looks like an excellent mindscrew; fortunately, I’m bent on immersing myself in mindscrew media at the moment.

  28.  

    Serenity. Again. I just love Summer Glau’s fight sequences.

  29.  

    I know that I’ve mentioned this before, but Blade Runner is an absolutely PERFECT movie.

  30.  

    ^^I watching that right now.

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2010
     

    I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time… like tears in rain… Time to die.

  31.  

    And I love that quote.

  32.  

    “I’m gonna give you a few seconds before I come. One… Two…”

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2010
     

    That quote is so awesome. It chokes me up just a tiny bit.

    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2010
     

    Land of the Lost. Beyond terrible.

    • CommentAuthorRocky
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2010
     
    I don't understand how Will Ferrell keeps getting roles.
    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2010
     

    I just watched Zombieland. It is incredibly, stupidly hilarious.

    And It goes against everything I stand for:

    But I love it.

    And I’d so be Tallahassee

    Damn

  33.  

    What in the world do you stand for that Zombieland goes against? Are you pro-Undead Rights? Are you anti-Ghostbusters? WHAT?

    The only thing I didn’t like about that movie was Columbus using a double-barrel shotgun for the whole movie, especially for a guy so focused on sense and efficiency it’s a really impractical choice.

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2010
     

    8D Emma Stone. :3

  34.  

    :3

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    I’m pro-Twinkies, Sansa. A world without Twinkies is a world in which all must die. And they unjustly murdered a whole box of them. A whole goddamn box. Also: Zombies should either be slow in hordes, or sparse but nimble. Not fast hordes. Then we’re all screwed.

    And the double-barrel shotgun was stupid. Especially when there were all those other, awesomer and in every way more efficient and practical guns.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    I completely and absolutely disagree on the shotgun.

    The shotgun is the Zombie Killer™, it’s iconic, when zombies invade you grab your shotgun and blow their brains out. Plus, there’s nothing more badass then pumping a shotgun.

    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010 edited
     

    I have no opinion on the matter. However, it is true that double barreled shotguns look totally badass. But in a zombie situation, I would definitely go for something lighter, faster, and hopefully less deafening. The last time I used a shotgun, I’m fairly sure my right eardrum was blasted to little traumatised shreds of flesh.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    Well yeah, in a case of a real Zombie Invasion I would want a flamethrower. But it’s a movie, double barreled shotguns are a must when it comes to fighting zombies.

    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010 edited
     

    I think we need to use dragons instead of flamethrowers. Purple ones.

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010 edited
     

    I disagree. Has anyone fired a good .45? That would be my zombie weapon of choice. :D

    Or this. I’d really like this:

    Or this:

    Or this: (I hid it because it’s badassery is so huge)

    Or anything huge and badass that can discharge small things at a high velocity.

    Like a spud gun from hell.

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    Epic.

    Helven Aprovaledge is granted.

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    Portal Gun. :3

    •  
      CommentAuthorPuppet
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010 edited
     

    The Portal Gun would be my weapon of choice against a zombie horde. :D

    Iwantonesobadly

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    Iwantonesobadly

    Me too. :(

  35.  

    I’d just take off and nuke the site from orbit. It would be the only way to be sure.

    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    Like a spud gun from hell.

    True, true. But it would have to be one of those really heavy duty potato guns, the sort that can shoot trailer hitches. Because potatoes alone would not be sufficient against a zombie invasion.

  36.  

    What about a Lancer from Gears of War? You know, the machine gun with the chainsaw bayonet.

    •  
      CommentAuthorarska
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2010
     

    ...

    pines

  37.  

    My weapons of choice against zombies:

    Anyway, unrelated to Zombieland, but I spent 2 periods today watching Twilight like the worthless teacher I was subbing for expected, and 2 periods watching Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II(which I borrowed from a student to use). I haven’t watched any of the TMNT movies in like a decade, but hilariously, they actually seemed like superior movies. The turtles emote better than most of Twilight’s actors, and the characterization is at least a million times stronger. Some of the jokes actually worked, too, unlike most of the ‘funny’ lines in Twilight which make me want to harm myself.

    I actually want to watch the TMNT movies again now.

  38.  

    I saw Saturday Night Fever for one of my classes. It sucked. A lot. Creepy, poorly written, and badly dated.

    • CommentAuthorRocky
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2010 edited
     
    Zombies? Meet my solution:

    •  
      CommentAuthorVirgil
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2010
     

    I would say ‘excessive’ but I own stock in the Empire.

    •  
      CommentAuthorNorthmark
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2010
     

    Clash of the Titans was strictly average.

    • CommentAuthorNo One
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2010
     

    Ah! You saw it?

    •  
      CommentAuthorNorthmark
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2010 edited
     

    It has some cool battle scenes (the Medusa part was neat) but the characters are pretty flat and the 3D can’t be described as anything but disorienting.

    • CommentAuthorNo One
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2010
     

    LOL actually, I haven’t seen it yet but I want to.

    But no, I must wait for the DVD to come out. T_T

    •  
      CommentAuthorDiamonte
    • CommentTimeApr 2nd 2010
     

    The SciFi channel is showing Eragon tomorrow night at 9 Eastern/8 Central. I think I’m going to microwave some popcorn and crank up the lulz.

  39.  

    Do it, it’s tons of fun.

  40.  

    Oh man. So a theater in my town has “midnight movie” events every weekend, which are a load of fun. This weekend is The Big Lebowski, and next weekend is Serenity. I’m stoked!

    •  
      CommentAuthorSpanman
    • CommentTimeApr 3rd 2010
     

    Aw shucks, Northmark, I was planning to see Clash of the Titans tonight. D: