Vanilla 1.1.8 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
People seem more or less settled down now, so I think it’s a good time to start putting in place some structure. That way we don’t run into problems in the future. I’ll also be busy later in the summer, so it’d be good if I got some help watching out for trouble.
So, if you’d like to nominate someone for moderatorship, that’d be very helpful. It’s better for moderators to be picked by the community rather than just by the moderators. That way you guys pick someone you feel you would respect, and hopefully do respect that person when it comes to enforcing rules. :)
Kitty (if she ever shows up <.<), Snow White Queen, and Rand.
We can only nominate three, right?
Gotcha. In that case, gonna have to go with Nate Winchester.
EDIT: Oh! And you, if you don’t already have some super-admin powers.
I say Kitty, Snow White Queen, and Nate Winchester. >.<
Everyone who regularly contributes to the site, unless that’s too many.
Thats the hardest part, there are too many good people. Too hard to choose :(
I would nominate Grignr the Ecordian, but he doesn’t have an account.
I… can I use my nomination to de-nominate someone? :(
I think I’ll just go ahead and remind people that the traits of a good moderator are: responsibility, thoughtfulness, and objectivity.
So many good people to choose from! DDDD:
Being objective means being loathed, being thoughtful means always trying to look for the truth behind the words, and being responsible means being impartial. Only a bastard can do these things, but people don’t like bastards.
Yeah… but you see, in the old forums a lot of the moderation effort went into making sure Rand didn’t get into trouble, is the thing. You need the moderators to be internet veterans.
There doesn’t need to be any limit on the number we have, really. And yes, I’m inclined towards the older and more experienced users. Not that you younger people wouldn’t be great moderators given time, but I do think we should give you that time to learn.
@SWQ
It means that other topics can’t be bumped on top of it, even if they’ve received more recent comments.
edit
I second the nomination of Lccorp2, by the way. Anyone who regularly contributes to the main site.
I’m going to go ahead and nominate Artimaeus. :P
I can be a good, just not kind or whimsy. I stand for truth and reason, not making people feel good and secure about things. I don’t rule with favoritism or other nepotist concerns, and in my opinion every member is the same by rights, even the unpopular ones or new ones. If biting words are needed to open some eyes I don’t mind biting words. Decorum is a false impression of what we really think and feel inside. I think that just disarms people from seeking the truth. They see someone say soft and gentle words and assume they have experienced life and have maturity, but that is just another illusion people hide behind. The real truth is in the reasons, not the voice, not the face, not the kindness.
This is why I am a bastard by title, you see, people like me are seen as cruel and vicious for being honest and critical. I don’t like hiding shit behind a sophisticated facade. If I disagree I disagree openly, and that disturbs people who want peace and tranquility.
Might as well play my role as bastard since I have a vitriolic sense of humor too.
Almost all of religion is perverted philosophy and ethics. A noble lie.
But let’s not talk about that since people get hurt when we do.
Not really. I’m not much of a team player unless people can give me a compelling argument for violating my principles. I might disagree with the other mods.
My vote goes to SWQ.
Provoking a reaction isn’t the same thing as saying something significant.
Provoking a reaction isn’t the same thing as saying something significant.
o rly. What if the reaction is the only way to express a series of complex thoughts?
Perhaps I was being too general. Provoking a reaction isn’t necessarily the same thing as saying something significant. I can certainly provoke a reaction by throwing a couple of key words such as “abortion”, “homosexuality”, “George W. Bush” and “Obama” into an internet forum, but don’t have to say anything significant about them.
There we go.
And let’s not derail this thread.
My votes go toward…
Lccorp2 and SWQ. I reserve the third for someone else, once I think of someone to vote for. I haven’t been around particularly long yet, so I’m hopefully being objective here.
My votes for lccorp2 and SWQ as well.
Might as well jump on the name-abbreviating bandwagon.
CB, stop flaming. Believe it or not, it is indeed possible to express your thoughts clearly without being a pointlessly confrontational jerk. People do it quite a bit, actually.
Dan out.
lmao, you guys will only understand what I’m saying later, so it’s all good.
We’re more of a democ-crazy, anyway :D
O.o Someone nominated me? Wow. Though technically I was a “mod” on the old forums, but I don’t know if that crosses over here. And I’m a mod on a few other websites….not that I’m bragging or anything. whistles innocently
If “everyone who contributes” is too many, I’ll go for LordSnow, SWQ and Ari.
‘course not! Sly is only giving us the illusion of freedom and democracy, but in truth he has already deployed an AI who can both moderate AND suck your soul like sherbet…
Thanks for the nominations everyone.
What ever happened to my old mod comrades, like SSD? And Legion?
I don’t know. Kitty hasn’t been on yet either. Maybe they’re staying the heck away until this forum slows down a little.
Did I mention I nominate Nate Winchester? If not, I do so now.
Wouldn’t it be such a coup if we could get SMeyer on here?
thinks better of it
I don’t think coup is the word I want.
Randall Monroe, that bastard.
Yeah, that’ll work.
looks at xkcd
immediately begins hoping Smeyer never, ever, ever reads that comic
You win for saying “Man-weep.” And for voting for me. ;)
Anyways, something similar kind of happened, with CP… Him or his people found out who we were and we lost an interview because of it.
Lol I just saw it. Win-dom.
‘We’ as in ImpishIdea or ‘We’ as in Lord Snow’s other life?
Curse you and your dual lives!
Sucks, doesn’t it? I don’t know why we can’t just sit around as brains in tanks and sponge off internet connections.
EDIT: Does that even make sense?
I hope so. I want that -
Except then we’d lose our sense of escape.
what are mmo’s?
Lol. Swenson and I are setting up a monopoly thread.
Maybe if we have telekinetic brains?
‘We’ as in ImpishIdea or ‘We’ as in Lord Snow’s other life?
We as in ImpishIdea. Gah, my friend nearly lost her job for offering that opportunity, too. Those guys are indecent.
What happened?
Shurtugal.com gets to do the same thing, and nobody cancels their interviews. :P
Well, were the questions going to be mean or attacking? I mean, if you’re going to fire a bunch of questions at me that all basically ask me why I suck, what’s the point in going ahead with the interview? I personally don’t blame the PaoPao Peeps.
Out of interest, what were the questions? What could we possibly have to ask him?
These are the questions we came up with.
I think you can agree, those questions were pretty tame all around.
DAMNDAMNDAMN?
I expect this thread to become more heated now we know the full benefits of being a mod…
Yes but being as how he’s on record saying he likes to provoke people, he’ll be the first suspect whenever posts are deleted.
On second thoughts, it could be fun to get him in trouble…
Deleting posts is stupid.
I’d have 10x more fun with the ability to impersonate a member.